the voice of customer experience technology
Front page
InterviewCX Trust26 Feb 2026 · 1 min read

Who is Liable When AI Agents Go Rogue?

Agentic AI is shifting from content generation to real-world execution - bringing new security, liability, and governance risks.

In this CX Today interview, he explains that while chatbots were like "parrots in a cage," harmlessly mimicking language, agentic AI is a "wise owl" that has broken out, capable of executing actions, accessing bank accounts, and wiping data. The shift, he notes, is from content to consequence.

Fornes warns that consumers and enterprises are currently acting as "unpaid QA analysts," handing over credentials to systems they don't fully understand. He compares the current adoption of agentic AI to handing your wallet to a stranger at an airport simply because they hold a sign claiming they can book cheap flights. He also highlights a critical legal gap: if an agent "hallucinates" a transaction or commits a cyber error, the liability currently points to the human who clicked "run," not the software provider.

The interview also covers the unique challenge of securing these systems. Unlike traditional software, which is binary (access granted or denied), AI agents operate on linguistics and interpretation, making them vulnerable to prompt injection and manipulation. Fornes advises leaders to treat agentic AI like a "talented but reckless genius"—valuable for ideas, but never to be trusted with the keys to the company’s most critical data without extreme skepticism.

rate this story
helps rank stories across uc today
The discussion0 takes · attributed & checked

Does this reflect your experience?

opening the room…
Read nextordered by techtelligence · every pick explained
same beat · CX Trust

When AI Agents Ignore “No,” Security Gets Real

24 Sept 2026
matches this topicVerint Warns AI Value Needs Better Data3 Sept 2026matches this topicBill Gates AI Warning Should Shake CX Leaders31 Aug 2026