the voice of customer experience technology
Front pagesponsored · AudioCodes
CX Trust1h · 13:31 BST · 3 min read

Microsoft Teams Recording: Retention Is Only the Start

Native Teams recording gives users a basic capture tool, but regulated organisations need something built for policy, retention and evidence. That gap between consumer-grade capture and compliance-grade recording is reshaping the market, pushing vendors to build purpose-made tools around it

Close-up of a hand at a laptop keyboard about to play a video interview, branded with the AudioCodes logo

The enterprise UC market is growing fast, and recording is being pulled along with it. Microsoft, Cisco and Zoom remain the dominant players, and their voice user bases are expanding by around 15% a year, according to Guy Yaffe, VP of Interaction Recordings at AudioCodes, a pace that's driving parallel growth in demand for recording. 

That growth was already reshaping the market before generative AI arrived. Yaffe points to the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 as the moment the picture changed again, not just for UC but across every industry now working out what's possible with the data it already holds. 

Recording is becoming a commodity. This is becoming the building block for a more lucrative service, voice analytics. 

Before any organisation gets to that layer, it needs recording that can actually support it. And that starts with a distinction Yaffe sees organisations get wrong constantly: the difference between recording that's convenient and recording that's compliant. 

Native Teams Recording Was Never Built For This 

Microsoft Teams has offered native recording for years, and for a lot of use cases, it works fine. The problem, Yaffe argues, isn't that it falls short. It's that it was never designed to do what regulated organisations now need from it. 

They were designed to give us basic recording functionality, when we want it, how we want it, with full control as a user. I can delete it whenever I want, and it will expire in two or three weeks, like it never happened. 

That user-controlled model, opt-in, deletable, expiring, is a long way from what a bank or insurer needs. A recording a user can switch off or erase isn't a record at all once it matters most. 

What Compliance-Grade Recording Actually Requires 

For regulated organisations, Yaffe says the requirement is policy-based recording: automatic, non-negotiable capture applied to specific users rather than left to individual discretion. Typically that covers 10 to 15% of the organisation, usually customer-facing roles, with the exact scope shaped by local regulation such as MiFID II in Europe. 

Nobody on earth can delete it or change the content. 

The requirement extends well past voice. In a Teams environment, Yaffe says regulated organisations need to capture video, screen share and any other channel a customer-facing employee might use, whether they're at their desk, on a mobile, or working off-site. If it counts as business communication, it needs to be captured, wherever it happens. 

Retention compounds the difficulty. For regulated sectors like BFSI, that typically means seven to ten years of immutable, tamper-proof archiving, a materially different engineering problem than a Teams recording that quietly expires after a few weeks. And it has to hold up under scrutiny long after the fact. 

In case the regulator knocks on your door and needs a specific portion of the recording from a few years ago, it's kept until released. 

Assessing Whether Your Current Approach Holds Up 

For an IT or compliance leader reviewing an existing recording setup, Yaffe frames the evaluation around two practical questions once the "why" is already settled. First, who actually needs to be recorded, and does the current setup capture them across every channel they use, not just voice. Second, when a regulator or internal investigator needs to find something specific, how easily can it be located and retrieved. 

An organisation that can't answer both with confidence is likely still relying on tools built for individual convenience rather than the policy-driven, auditable capture regulated communication now demands. Get that foundation right, and years of archived conversation stop being a compliance cost and start being something the business can actually use. 

Guy Yaffe goes deeper in our video interview on where Teams recording and voice analytics are heading next. 

The discussion0 takes · attributed & checked

Does this reflect your experience?

opening the room…
Read nextordered by techtelligence · every pick explained
more from AudioCodes · sponsored

From Teams Recording to Conversation Intelligence: How Organisations Can Get More from Every Call

23 Sept 2026
same beat · CX TrustWhen AI Agents Ignore “No,” Security Gets Real24 Sept 2026same beat · CX TrustWhy AI Is Pushing UK Businesses to Take Back Control of Their Data23 Sept 2026